User talk:Raphael Figueira
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Filnik 22:13, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Uniao Sao Joao Araras EC.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Uniao Sao Joao Araras EC.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:13, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Your various recent changes to this deletion request and this image are against our rules and amount to Commons:Vandalism. If you make any more such changes you will be blocked from editing on Commons. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:05, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]I have blocked this user indefinitely for repeated threats and harassment over the issue laid out at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ps palma.jpg. He put the image of his own hand into the Public Domain in December 2007. It is widely used on various WMF projects. He now wants to remove it from Commons. Several of us have pointed out that you cannot remove something from the Public Domain -- the both as a legal and as a practical matter, once it is PD, it cannot be taken back because anyone who had a copy of the image could upload it again without attribution or source. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:01, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, you just block a user taxpayer who never gave trouble in the past! But you're right, I wonder what is the deadline for inteterminado because I had stopped editing the files and all the messages that were posted in the last hours in the pages of DISCUSSION. Another detail, the "widely used" it's almost an insult, because only a few items use. - Raphael Figueira (talk) 11:06, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- I have reduced this block to a week in the hope that you will calm down and stop demanding something that isn't going to happen. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:27, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
File:Escudo Campinas FC.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko: Por que o ficheiro foi excluído sem consentimento geral? Quais argumentos foram usados? Essa atitude foi totalmente arbitraria! Por que o senhor também não aproveita seu status para excluir ficheiros como File:Guarani FC (E) - SP.svg, File:Escudo Oficial Ponte Preta.png, File:Palmeiras logo.svg? Qual a diferente desses ficheiros e do meu? Ele estava usando as mesmas predefinições de permissão desses escudos usados na Wikimedia Commons!
OBSERVAÇÃO: já havia side definido que não deveria ser excluído com base aqui Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Association football logos of São Paulo!
Raphael Figueira (talk) 16:55, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
File tagging File:CEMEP Paulínia.png
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:CEMEP Paulínia.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko: O ficheiro existe desde 27 de agosto de 2011 e hoje 5 anos depois você decide com base em uma fraca argumentação que ele não possui informação sobre a permissão dada, ora essas informações estão bem descritas e são elas:
This image shows a flag, a coat of arms, a seal or some other official insignia. The use of such symbols is restricted in many countries. These restrictions are independent of the copyright status. |
This work is in the public domain in Brazil for one of the following reasons:
|
Raphael Figueira (talk) 16:56, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
File:CEMEP Paulínia.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Amitie 10g (talk) 16:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Brasão de Campinas - SP
[edit]- Olá Raphael Figueira, já fiz o brasão da cidade de Campinas - SP.
- Feito aqui está o resultado.
- @BrCaLeTo: Muito obrigado amigo! Quando a bandeira, você conseguiu fazer uma versão melhor em SVG? Abraços Raphael Figueira (talk) 23:23, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Brasão Una (Bahia).jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Brasão Una (Bahia).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Brasão Una (Bahia).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Gunnex (talk) 19:45, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Brasão de Tocantinópolis.png
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Brasão de Tocantinópolis.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Brasão de Tocantinópolis.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Gunnex (talk) 19:45, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Brasão de Tocantinópolis.png
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Brasão de Tocantinópolis.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Brasão de Tocantinópolis.png]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Gunnex (talk) 19:45, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Brasão Una (Bahia).jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Brasão Una (Bahia).jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Brasão Una (Bahia).jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Gunnex (talk) 19:45, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
File:Paulo Nobre (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gunnex (talk) 06:57, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Brasão de Tocantinópolis.png
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Brasão de Tocantinópolis.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Brasão de Tocantinópolis.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Gunnex (talk) 23:21, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Gunnex (talk) 23:33, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
Categorias vs Tags
[edit]Olá Rafael, td bem contigo? Obrigado por suas edições no Wikimedia Commons. Note, no entanto, que o sistema de categorias é um pouco distinto das famosas "tags" de fotos. Na grande maioria dos casos, deve-se usar apenas a categoria mais específica dentre um mesmo ramo de categorias. Ou seja, Category:Things named after Guilherme de Almeida, por já ser uma subcategoria de Category:Guilherme de Almeida, já basta para categoria da Praça Guilherme de Almeida. Got it? Abraços, Sturm (talk) 23:43, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
[edit]Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.
Thank you!
Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
[edit]Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.
If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
[edit]Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.
File tagging File:David Berglas.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:David Berglas.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:David Berglas.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
GMGtalk 15:07, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
File:070417 Mostra Italiana Parque Prado fotos Toninho Oliveira (46) (33744164012).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 14:11, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Inauguração da Unidade Territorial da EMBRAPA.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Inauguração da Unidade Territorial da EMBRAPA.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Inauguração da Unidade Territorial da EMBRAPA.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Public domain mark not valid on Commons, no evidence of license grant/PD dedication. Yours sincerely, Mdaniels5757 (talk) 23:16, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Lançamento Livro Antologia 60 Anos Academia Campinense de Letras (1).jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Lançamento Livro Antologia 60 Anos Academia Campinense de Letras (1).jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Lançamento Livro Antologia 60 Anos Academia Campinense de Letras (1).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Lançamento Livro Antologia 60 Anos Academia Campinense de Letras (2).jpg
- File:Lançamento Livro Antologia 60 Anos Academia Campinense de Letras (3).jpg
- File:Revolução de 1932 Cerimonia.jpg
Public domain mark not an acceptable license. Yours sincerely, Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:16, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Mdaniels5757: All of these images are marked as Public Domain on Flickr by the Municipality of Campinas. Thanks Raphael Figueira (talk) 20:27, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- I'm aware. The problem is that the Public Domain Mark has no legal effect -- it's as if there is no license at all. For the image to be able to be used, they would need to change it to a free license, like CC0 or CC-BY-4.0. Best, Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:29, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Mdaniels5757: Can I change a Public Domain license to CC0 or CC-BY-4.0? Raphael Figueira (talk) 20:32, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- If you took the picture, yes. However, it looks like the town owns the picture, so they would have to change it on flickr. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:33, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Mdaniels5757: Can I change a Public Domain license to CC0 or CC-BY-4.0? Raphael Figueira (talk) 20:32, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- I'm aware. The problem is that the Public Domain Mark has no legal effect -- it's as if there is no license at all. For the image to be able to be used, they would need to change it to a free license, like CC0 or CC-BY-4.0. Best, Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:29, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Statue of Trygve Lie (3).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
4ing (talk) 09:01, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Fru Fortuna (1).jpg
- File:Fru Fortuna (5).jpg
- File:Fru Fortuna (4).jpg
- File:Fru Fortuna (3).jpg
- File:Statue of Trygve Lie (1).jpg
- File:Statue of Trygve Lie (2).jpg
- File:Bust of Sigrid Undset (2).jpg
- File:Bust of Sigrid Undset (3).jpg
- File:Bust of Sigrid Undset (5).jpg
- File:Bust of Sigrid Undset (4).jpg
- File:Bust of Sigrid Undset (1).jpg
- File:Bust of Sigrid Undset (6).jpg
- File:Vettløyse 004 1978.jpg
- File:Vettløyse 005.jpg
- File:Vettløyse 002.jpg
- File:Vettløyse 001.jpg
- File:Vettløyse 003.jpg
Yours sincerely, 4ing (talk) 09:13, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Simone
[edit]Ola´Rapahel, pode me dizer como podesmo retirar todas essas fotos da cantora Simone do ar, é uma solicitação da própria assessoria dela. OK? Não são autorizadas.
- @189.4.184.186: Olá, tudo bem?! Em primeiro lugar, gostaria de deixar claro que todas as fotos disponíveis aqui também estão disponíveis nessa conta do Flicker flickr.com/photos/simonepedacos com a licença CC-BY-SA-2.0.
- Eu recomendo vocês entrarem em contato com a pessoa que subiu o conteúdo sem autorização (não fui eu). Também recomendo vocês criarem uma conta oficial na Wikimedia Commons para solicitar e mediar a situção. Outra coisa muito importante SEMPRE assine os seus comentários com as 4 aporstrofes ~~ ~~.
- Fora isso irei solicitar internamente a exclusão das fotos que eu subi automaticamente. Atenciosamente Raphael Figueira (talk) 15:13, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Simone
[edit]Olá, Solicitamos que esta imagem seja deletada: File:Simone (4009940994).jpg. Quanto tempo leva para retirar do ar? Já foi solicitada ha mtas semanas. Não há autorização. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cigarra2021 (talk • contribs) 23:42, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Simone 2
[edit]N sei de onde vc tirou q falei de forma autoritária, mas vc tá mais preocupado em retirar uma foto ilegal do ar, ou me acusar de autoritarismo? Veja fui bloqueada da Wikipedia, de forma aterrorizante, o artigo tá chei de erros. Incontáveis ameaças de bloqueio por causa de meras edições e ajustes, até sermos bloqueados de vez, depois de passar meses escrevendo o artigo. Vc pode me dizer quem é o administrador com quem devo falar? Cigarra2021 (talk) 18:55, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Visite o artigo da Simone e veja o que é ameça, má fé e autoritarismo. Como podemos retirar a foto do ar, ela não é autorizada.
- Você fala comigo achando que eu tenho poder de decisão, a sua fala foi autoritária sim! A Wikipédia não é um projeto pessoal, é uma enciclopédia livre e global. Infelizmente você está tão perdida que confunde Wikimedia Commons com Wikipédia Lusofonia. Eu não conheço administradores, você como usuária pode solicitar a exclusão das fotos. Sua escrita demonstra total desconhecimento técnico e de normas, você não assina comentários e provavelmente não lê diretrizes. Terá grandes dificuldades se seguir assim! Favor pesquisar como solicitar exclusão, vou te dar uma ajudar nesse link Commons:Deletion requests, sem leitura, sem atuação, sem entendimento você provavelmente vai continuar cometendo os mesmos erros! Raphael Figueira (talk) 20:21, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Visite o artigo da Simone e veja o que é ameça, má fé e autoritarismo. Como podemos retirar a foto do ar, ela não é autorizada.
File:Renato Russo, 1987.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Darwin Ahoy! 21:48, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Gonzaguinha (cropped).jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Simone 1973 simone (712017813).jpg)
Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk. |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Edu!.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 16:59, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
File:20 10 2021 Võlei Campeão recebido na prefeitura Fotos Manoel de Brito (2) (51610636677).jpg
[edit]File:20 10 2021 Võlei Campeão recebido na prefeitura Fotos Manoel de Brito (2) (51610636677).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
219.78.154.228 03:46, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Palco Lua - Geração de Valor (16418033806).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Taivo (talk) 09:19, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Thomas Sankara (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Bookish Worm (talk) 14:06, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Fernando-diniz-paulista-de-jundiai (cropped).jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Fernando-diniz-paulista-de-jundiai (cropped).jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Fernando-diniz-paulista-de-jundiai (cropped).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Eta Carinae (talk) 18:29, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Fernando-diniz-paulista-de-jundiai (2).jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Fernando-diniz-paulista-de-jundiai (2).jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Fernando-diniz-paulista-de-jundiai (2).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |