Commons:Deletion requests/File:People-3298899.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Not licensed CC0 Creative Commons on Pixabay but under Pixabay license which is incompatible with Commons. Pixabay has (or had?) CC0 content, documented at this file via wayback machine. However, this is not true for this file. Martin H. (talk) 14:51, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
_-_Le_Café_Des_Orgues,_Herzeele_(2016-02-15_16.07.33_by_Albert_Dezetter_@pixabay_1232317).jpg){kind=link}
- Looks identical to other Pixabay licensed images uploaded on Commons. --Invokingvajras (Invokingvajras) 15:54, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Image has been uploaded to Pixabay before 9 January 2019 so it is Creative Commons CC0 1.0 licensed. See Template:Pixabay for more information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Commons2020 (talk • contribs) 02:17, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
.svg/15px-Pictogram_voting_comment_(orange).svg.png)
Comment: License is OK per upload 2018-04-07 to pixabay. But: If one is checking pixabay files one should look at the data shown at the right of the pixabay page. If it's a photograph and no data like camera etc. is given it requires a closer look. Either metadata is missing or the photograph is not uploader's own work but grabbed from pexels or the like (we've had such cases in the past). Well, the other photographs shot by SadahamYathra (see this one for example) look fine. Why is there no EXIF? It's a montage, the girl has been put into the image afterwards and this way the EXIF has accidentally gone lost, see also fotoforensics. So it is some kind of DW and if we assume that the photo of the girl is by SadahamYathra, too, we can keep the image without problems. --Achim (talk) 20:50, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info, Pixabay indeed has/had a few users which simply copy-paste other people's work in bulk on there. Finding the ultimate source of a work remains a hard problem. --Commons2020 (talk) 22:21, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Keep Image was uploaded on April 7, 2018 to pixabay so the license was cc0 at upload then. Pixabay only changed their licensing for their photos on January 9, 2019 See this {{Pixabay}}. Image reviewed by me. --Leoboudv (talk) 03:28, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Valid pixabay CC0 license. --Achim (talk) 09:17, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
